A single Epley manoeuvre can improve self-perceptions of disability (quality of life) in patients with pc-BPPV: A randomised controlled trial in primary care / Impacto de la maniobra de Epley en la discapacidad autopercibida en pacientes con vértigo posicional paroxístico benigno: un ensayo controlado aleatorio en atención primaria

Objective: The purpose of the study was to compare the impact of the EM and a sham manoeuvre in primary care on self-perceived disability. Design: Randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial conducted in primary care with a follow-up of 1 year. Participants: Patients aged ≥18 years old diagnosed with pc-BPPV according to the Dix–Hallpike test (DHT) were randomised to: Interventions: Intervention (EM) group or a control (sham manoeuvre) group. Main measurements: The main study covariates were age, sex, history of depression and anxiety, presence of nystagmus in the DHT, patient-perceived disability assessed with the Dizziness Handicap Inventory – screening version (DHI-S). Data were analyzed using bivariate and multivariate mixed Tobit analyses. Results: Overall, 134 patients were studied: 66 in the intervention group and 68 in the control group. Median age was 52 years (interquartile range [IQR], 38.25–68.00 years. standard deviation, 16.98) and 76.12% of the patients were women. The DHT triggered nystagmus in 40.30% of patients. The median total DHI-S score for the overall sample at baseline was 16 (IQR, 8.00–22.00); 16 [IQR, 10.5–24.0] vs 10 [6.0–14.0] for women vs men (P<.001). Patients treated with the EM experienced a mean reduction of 2.03 points in DHI-S score over the follow-up period compared with patients in the sham group. Conclusions: Pc-BPPV affects the quality of life of primary care patients. A single EM can improve self-perceptions of disability by around 2 points on the DHI-S scale.(AU)

Objetivo: El propósito del estudio fue comparar el impacto de la ME y una maniobra simulada en Atención Primaria sobre la discapacidad autopercibida. Diseño: Ensayo clínico aleatorizado, doble ciego y controlado realizado en Atención Primaria con un seguimiento de un año. Participantes:Los pacientes ≥18 años diagnosticados de pc-BPPV según la prueba de Dix-Hallpike (DHT) fueron aleatorizados para: Intervenciones: Grupo de intervención (EM) o un grupo de control (maniobra simulada). Variables principales: Las principales variables del estudio fueron la edad, el sexo, los antecedentes de depresión y ansiedad, la presencia de nistagmo en la DHT, la discapacidad percibida por el paciente, evaluada con la versión de cribado del Inventario de discapacidad del vértigo (DHI-S). Los datos se analizaron mediante análisis Tobit mixtos bivariados y multivariados. Resultados: Se estudió a 134 pacientes: 66 en el grupo de intervención y 68 en el grupo de control. La mediana de edad fue de 52 años (rango intercuartílico [IQR], 38,25-68,00 años; desviación estandar 16,98) y el 76,12% de los pacientes eran mujeres. La DHT desencadenó nistagmo en el 40,30% de los pacientes. La media del DHI-S para la muestra general al inicio del estudio fue de 16 (IQR 8,00-22,00); 16 (RIQ, 10,5-24,0) frente a 10 (6,0-14,0) para mujeres frente a hombres (p<0,001). Los pacientes tratados con ME experimentaron una reducción media de 2,03 puntos en la puntuación DHI-S durante el período de seguimiento en comparación con los pacientes del grupo simulado. Conclusiones: El Pc-BPPV afecta a la calidad de vida de los pacientes de Atención Primaria. Una sola ME puede mejorar la autopercepción de la discapacidad en alrededor de 2 puntos en la escala DHI-S.(AU)

A single Epley manoeuvre can improve self-perceptions of disability (quality of life) in patients with pc-BPPV: A randomised controlled trial in primary care.

Posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (pc-BPPV) causes physical, functional, and emotional impairment. The treatment is the Epley manoeuvre (EM). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to compare the impact of the EM and a sham manoeuvre in primary care on self-perceived disability. DESIGN: Randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial conducted in primary care with a follow-up of 1 year. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥18 years old diagnosed with pc-BPPV according to the Dix-Hallpike test (DHT) were randomised to: INTERVENTIONS: Intervention (EM) group or a control (sham manoeuvre) group. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The main study covariates were age, sex, history of depression and anxiety, presence of nystagmus in the DHT, patient-perceived disability assessed with the Dizziness Handicap Inventory - screening version (DHI-S). Data were analyzed using bivariate and multivariate mixed Tobit analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 134 patients were studied: 66 in the intervention group and 68 in the control group. Median age was 52 years (interquartile range [IQR], 38.25-68.00 years. standard deviation, 16.98) and 76.12% of the patients were women. The DHT triggered nystagmus in 40.30% of patients. The median total DHI-S score for the overall sample at baseline was 16 (IQR, 8.00-22.00); 16 [IQR, 10.5-24.0] vs 10 [6.0-14.0] for women vs men (P<.001). Patients treated with the EM experienced a mean reduction of 2.03 points in DHI-S score over the follow-up period compared with patients in the sham group. CONCLUSIONS: Pc-BPPV affects the quality of life of primary care patients. A single EM can improve self-perceptions of disability by around 2 points on the DHI-S scale.

Paving the Way Toward Distinguishing Fallers From Non-fallers in Bilateral Vestibulopathy: A Wide Pilot Observation.

Patients with bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP) present with unsteadiness during standing and walking, limiting their activities of daily life and, more importantly, resulting in an increased risk of falling. In BVP patients, falls are considered as one of the major complications, with patients having a 31-fold increased risk of falling compared to healthy subjects. Thus, highlighting objective measures that can easily and accurately assess the risk of falling in BVP patients is an important step in reducing the incidence of falls and the accompanying burdens. Therefore, this study investigated the interrelations between demographic characteristics, vestibular function, questionnaires on self-perceived handicap and balance confidence, clinical balance measures, gait variables, and fall status in 27 BVP patients. Based on the history of falls in the preceding 12 months, the patients were subdivided in a "faller" or "non-faller" group. Results on the different outcome measures were compared between the "faller" and "non-faller" subgroups using Pearson's chi-square test in the case of categorical data; for continuous data, Mann-Whitney U test was used. Performances on the clinical balance measures were comparable between fallers and non-fallers, indicating that, independent from fall status, the BVP patients present with an increased risk of falling. However, fallers tended to report a worse self-perceived handicap and confidence during performing activities of daily life. Spatiotemporal parameters of gait did not differ between fallers and non-fallers during walking at slow, preferred, or fast walking speed. These results may thus imply that, when aiming to distinguish fallers from non-fallers, the BVP patients' beliefs concerning their capabilities may be more important than the moderately or severely affected physical performance within a clinical setting. Outcome measures addressing the self-efficacy and fear of falling in BVP patients should therefore be incorporated in future research to investigate whether these are indeed able to distinguish fallers form non-fallers. Additionally, information regarding physical activity could provide valuable insights on the contextual information influencing behavior and falls in BVP.